Get Your CDR-based MSA application Through a Professional/Specialist

This feedback arises from inconsistencies found in your application information. Due to these inconsistencies, Engineers Australia suspects potential tampering with the document submitted for your application. Therefore, you are required to write an explanatory letter addressing this issue to the assessing officer, supported by relevant evidence. Failure to provide a satisfactory explanation and evidence may result in the rejection of your application.

This feedback indicates that the topics (BBB) you included in your CDR application are not part of the syllabus for your AAA subject, which covered your overall project. To address this, you must write an explanatory letter to the case officer, detailing how you managed to undertake the project without the requisite foundational knowledge.

This is a critical comment that requires precise and accurate handling. It states that the evidence submitted, such as sketches, CAD drawings, and prototype pictures, does not support each other and appears inconsistent. There is also suspicion from Engineers Australia that some evidence may have been altered to substantiate your claims, potentially leading to misleading information. EA may escalate this matter to the Department of Home Affairs for further investigation if your application is not adequately explained. Given the gravity of the situation, I recommend seeking guidance from professional CDR writers to address this comment effectively.